# The 8 Best Embedded iPaaS Providers in 2025 The integration backlog sitting in your product roadmap isn't just a list of feature requests. It's a map of untapped revenue opportunities. Every enterprise prospect asking "Does it integrate with Salesforce?" represents a potential six figure deal. Every customer requesting HubSpot sync signals expansion revenue waiting to be unlocked. The numbers tell the story: 63% of companies invest in integrations specifically to improve customer retention. Meanwhile, the average enterprise now juggles 250-300 SaaS applications, creating an integration challenge that's both massive and mission critical. This explosion in SaaS adoption has fueled remarkable growth in the integration platform market. The iPaaS market was valued at $12.87 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $78.28 billion by 2032, representing a 25.9% compound annual growth rate. What makes this moment exciting: the embedded iPaaS category has reached critical mass. While 80% of businesses still build integrations in-house, 29% now use embedded iPaaS and 24% leverage unified APIs. The companies making the shift early are capturing competitive advantages that compound over time. Take 11x, whose AI sales agent needed real-time CRM data to engage prospects effectively. Using Ampersand, they cut their AI phone agent's response time from 60 seconds to 5, transforming a sluggish experience into an instant one. The question facing B2B SaaS leaders today isn't whether to invest in integration infrastructure. It's which platform aligns with your integration strategy: depth versus breadth, code first versus low code, point solution versus comprehensive suite. This guide evaluates eight leading embedded iPaaS providers across the dimensions that matter most. ## What Is Embedded iPaaS? Embedded iPaaS is a cloud-based integration platform that sits directly inside your SaaS product, enabling your customers to connect their systems without leaving your application. Unlike traditional enterprise iPaaS (which connects internal systems), embedded iPaaS powers customer facing, product-led integrations at scale. The distinction matters. When Salesforce needs to connect its internal marketing automation to its accounting system, that's enterprise iPaaS territory. IT teams configure tools behind the scenes. When *your* customer needs to sync *their* Salesforce instance with *your* product, that's where embedded iPaaS comes in. The integration lives inside your application interface, feels native to your product experience, and scales across hundreds or thousands of customers with unique configurations. ### When Integration Becomes Category Defining Not every integration tool qualifies as true embedded iPaaS. Prebuilt connectors and basic data sync represent table stakes. Embedded iPaaS becomes category-defining when it provides: - **Configurable field mapping** that lets customers choose which data flows where - **Custom object support** for enterprise data models that don't fit standard schemas - **Bi-directional sync** that maintains data integrity across systems - **Developer APIs and SDKs** for building integrations programmatically - **Version control and deployment pipelines** for managing integration code - **Customer self service tools** for activation, configuration, and troubleshooting The platform crosses from feature to strategic infrastructure when you're building integrations for five or more customer applications, when enterprise customers demand custom fields and objects, when you're syncing millions of records, or when integration maintenance starts consuming significant engineering resources. ### Three Key Trends Reshaping the Space **The Developer First vs. Low Code Divide** The market has bifurcated along technical lines. Developer-first platforms offer declarative frameworks, version control integration, and CI/CD compatibility. They treat integrations as code that lives in git repositories alongside your product. Low-code platforms optimize for drag-and-drop configuration and visual workflow builders, enabling non-technical teams to deploy integrations without engineering bottlenecks. The most sophisticated platforms now offer both approaches. Paragon, for instance, lets developers write integration logic in code, then view the same workflow in a visual builder while syncing everything to GitHub for proper version control. This hybrid model reflects a deeper understanding: different integrations require different tools. A straightforward Slack notification might take ten minutes in a visual builder. A complex enterprise data sync handling custom objects and field-level permissions demands code-level control. Gartner predicts that by 2025, 70% of new applications developed by enterprises will utilize low-code or no-code technologies, up from less than 25% in 2020. But in the embedded iPaaS space, this shift manifests differently than in general application development. Integration depth (the ability to handle custom fields, complex mappings, and enterprise-scale data volumes) still requires code first approaches for many use cases. **Deep Integration Infrastructure Over Unified APIs** The integration market has split into two camps with fundamentally different philosophies. Unified APIs standardize data schemas across tools, enabling developers to write once and connect to dozens of apps through a single interface. The promise: build one Salesforce integration and get HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Close for free, all speaking the same data language. Embedded iPaaS platforms take the opposite approach. They offer custom configurations per customer, slower initial setup, but enterprise-ready depth. Ampersand exemplifies this philosophy. Rather than forcing customer data into a standardized schema, it mirrors native APIs while standardizing interaction patterns. The technical precision matters here. Deep integrations handle custom objects (a manufacturing company's unique product configurations), custom fields (a healthcare provider's compliance metadata), and complex field mappings that respect how each customer actually uses their CRM. **AI-Native Integration Patterns** The integration requirements for AI powered products differ fundamentally from traditional SaaS integrations. When your product features an AI agent that needs to answer questions about a customer's pipeline, that agent requires real-time access to CRM data, not batch syncs that update overnight. 11x's experience demonstrates the stakes: their AI phone agent Julian originally took 60 seconds to fetch relevant context, creating awkward pauses during sales calls. After implementing Ampersand's real-time integration, response times dropped to 5 seconds. This shift toward AI-native workflows is driving new integration patterns. RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) pipelines need bidirectional CRM sync to keep vector embeddings current. Semantic search across customer data requires continuous synchronization. AI agents using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) need structured access to integration data without custom API work for every new data source. ## Who Needs Embedded iPaaS (and When)? The right time to invest in embedded iPaaS varies by company stage and customer profile. Here's how to recognize when the opportunity justifies the investment. ### Early-Stage SaaS (Seed to Series A) **The Opportunity:** Your first enterprise customer just asked if your product integrates with Salesforce. You could build it custom (three months of engineering time, ongoing maintenance, accumulating technical debt). Or, you could deploy it via embedded iPaaS in three weeks, then use that same infrastructure for the next ten integration requests. **Readiness signals**: - An enterprise prospect requires native CRM integration to close - You've lost deals explicitly to competitors with better integrations - Your engineering team is under ten people and can't dedicate full-time resources to integration infrastructure - Customer success is fielding questions about integration capabilities you don't have At the early stages, you want software that can get setup quickly and scale with you as your grow. You need developer-friendly products that can get setup quickly, startup-friendly pricing that scales with revenue, and a platform that won't require extensive onboarding. **Best fits for early-stage teams:** Ampersand helps early stage companies to get started quickly with an easy, code first implementation. ### Growth Stage SaaS (Series B to C) **The Opportunity:** You've built ten customer integrations manually. Customer success spends hours troubleshooting sync issues. Every new integration request triggers the same conversation: do we build it custom or turn down the customer? Meanwhile, enterprise prospects are asking for custom field mappings that your current approach can't handle. **Readiness signals** showing you've outgrown the DIY approach: - Supporting ten or more customer integrations with manual configuration for each - Customer success dedicating significant time to integration troubleshooting and support - Enterprise customers requesting custom field mappings beyond your standard integration's capabilities - Need for an integration marketplace where customers can self service activation and configuration At this stage, **prioritize scalability and customer self service**. The platform needs observability tools that let support teams diagnose issues without engineering intervention, version control for managing integration changes safely, and an embedded marketplace that reduces your activation burden. **Best fits for growth stage teams:** Ampersand shines when you need deep customization for enterprise customers, with developer friendly tools that treat integrations as code. ### Enterprise SaaS (Series D+) **The Opportunity:** Individual customers are syncing 10+ million records. You're handling custom objects and complex data models that vary wildly between customers. Integration has become a competitive differentiator. Prospects evaluate your integration capabilities during the sales process, and your win rate improves measurably when you can demonstrate sophisticated CRM sync. **Readiness signals** indicating enterprise grade infrastructure requirements: - Syncing 10 million or more records for individual enterprise customers - Custom objects and complex data models that require per customer configuration - Need for SLAs and enterprise level support commitments - Multiple internal teams (product, engineering, customer success, sales engineering) all touching different aspects of integration strategy At this stage, **prioritize enterprise scalability, compliance, and advanced customization**. You need infrastructure that handles bulk API operations efficiently, granular observability down to the field level, and support teams who understand enterprise integration challenges. **Best fits for enterprise teams:** Ampersand excels at handling enterprise complexity including custom objects, high data volumes, and sophisticated field mappings that enterprise customers demand. ### The Internal Opportunities Integration Creates Beyond the obvious external benefits (closing deals, retaining customers), embedded iPaaS creates internal opportunities that compound over time: **Competitive differentiation** in crowded markets where features converge. Native integrations become the wedge that wins deals against competitors who tell prospects to "just use Zapier." **Expansion revenue** unlocked by integrations that enable new use cases. When your product syncs with a customer's entire GTM stack, they find ways to expand usage across teams and departments. **Customer retention** dramatically improved by integration created switching costs. 63% of companies specifically invest in integrations to improve customer retention. The data validates what product leaders intuitively understand about integration driven stickiness. **Engineering focus** redirected from integration maintenance to core product innovation. The opportunity cost of having senior engineers manage CRM sync logic compounds over months and years. **Time to revenue** collapsed from quarters to weeks when launching integration partnerships. Instead of three months of custom development per integration, you ship new integrations in days. ## How We Chose the Best Embedded iPaaS Providers Evaluating embedded iPaaS platforms requires looking beyond feature checklists to understand the tradeoffs each platform makes. Here are the seven criteria that matter most. ### Integration Depth vs. Breadth The fundamental tradeoff in integration strategy: do you optimize for custom fields and objects (depth) or prebuilt connectors across many apps (breadth)? Depth first platforms like Ampersand let you read and write to any custom object in Salesforce, even ones created yesterday that don't exist in any standardized schema. Breadth first platforms like Merge give you 50+ CRM integrations through a single unified API, but you're constrained to the fields they've standardized across all those systems. Neither approach is universally superior. Enterprise deals often hinge on depth. The ability to sync that custom "Compliance_Status__c" field matters more than connecting to twenty different CRMs. SMB markets reward breadth. Covering the long tail of apps customers use drives adoption faster than perfecting one deep integration. We prioritized platforms that excel at their chosen strategy rather than trying to be all things to all buyers. ### Developer Experience The quality of developer experience compounds over time as your integration codebase grows. Will your integrations live in git repositories alongside product code? Can you write tests for integration logic? Does the platform support proper CI/CD workflows? Code first platforms provide APIs, SDKs, and CLI tools designed for engineers who want version control, code review, and automated testing. Low code platforms optimize for visual workflow builders accessible to non technical team members. Hybrid platforms offer both, letting you choose the right tool for each integration's complexity. ### Customer Self Service & UX The best embedded iPaaS platforms don't just enable *you* to build integrations. They enable *your customers* to configure, manage, and troubleshoot integrations themselves. Look for embedded marketplace capabilities that let customers discover and activate integrations without support tickets. Configuration wizards that guide customers through field mapping and authentication. Logging and alerting tools that surface integration status and errors directly to end users. self service troubleshooting that reduces the burden on your customer success team. ### Scalability & Performance Integration performance constraints have a nasty habit of appearing only after you've committed to a platform and migrated customers. By then, switching costs are enormous. Evaluate how platforms handle rate limiting (do they queue intelligently or just fail?), bulk API optimization (can they efficiently sync millions of records?), and real-time versus batch processing (does the architecture support the latency your product requires?). Some platforms show cracks at enterprise scale: performance degradation with large data volumes, inability to handle complex custom objects, or rate limiting issues that create sync delays. These problems are much harder to solve after you've built your integration strategy around a platform. ### Customization & Flexibility Every enterprise customer is different. Your embedded iPaaS needs to accommodate that reality through customization capabilities. Custom connector development becomes critical when customers use niche apps not covered by prebuilt connectors. Workflow and logic customization enables complex integration patterns beyond simple field mapping. White-labeling and branding options ensure integrations feel native to your product rather than obviously third-party. Platforms that constrain customization work fine for standardized use cases but create ceiling effects as you move upmarket. You discover the limitations only when an enterprise prospect requires functionality outside the platform's constraints, usually mid-sales cycle, when pivoting is expensive. ### Observability & Support When integrations break (and they will), granular observability determines how quickly you diagnose and resolve the issue. Object-level and field-level logging shows exactly what data synced successfully and what failed. Error handling and debugging tools let you trace problems through the integration workflow. Support responsiveness impacts how quickly you can resolve issues beyond your team's expertise. The difference between "we have logs" and "we have field-level granularity showing that custom_object_123 failed validation on the phone_number field due to formatting" can be the difference between hours and days of troubleshooting time. ### Pricing Model & Economics Embedded iPaaS pricing models vary wildly: per-connector fees, usage-based charges, platform license fees, data volume surcharges. The total cost of ownership often differs dramatically from initial pricing quotes. Per-connector pricing seems straightforward but can explode as you scale. Usage-based models align costs with value delivered but require careful estimation to budget accurately. Platform fees provide predictability but may be expensive for early-stage companies with limited integration needs. The economics need to work not just at your current scale but as you grow. A platform with perfect startup pricing but untenable enterprise economics creates painful migration decisions later. ## The 8 Best Embedded iPaaS Providers in 2025 *Note: This list includes platforms across different architectural approaches (traditional iPaaS, integration as code, unified APIs) because buyers evaluate them together when solving the same problem: customer facing integrations.* ### 1. Ampersand **Quick Overview** Ampersand is a developer-first integration infrastructure platform focused on deep, bidirectional integrations with CRM, GTM applications, ERP, and more. Ampersand offers integration as code where developers define integrations in declarative manifest files. Unlike unified APIs that standardize data schemas across tools, Ampersand mirrors native APIs while standardizing interaction patterns, giving developers the flexibility to handle custom objects, fields, and complex enterprise data models at scale. Ampersand’s architecture reflects a specific thesis about enterprise integration: depth first, treating integrations as code enables better version control and testing, and the integration infrastructure complexity of managing rate limits, retries, and bulk operations should be handled by the platform rather than your engineering team. **Best For** B2B SaaS companies building **deep CRM, ERP, HRIS, procurement, and GTM integrations for early, growth, and enterprise customers** who need custom field mappings, high-volume data sync (millions of records), and bidirectional workflows. Ampersand shines when you're competing for deals where the prospect's specific CRM configuration matters. If closing an enterprise deal depends on syncing their custom "Deal_Risk_Score__c" field, their industry-specific objects, and their unique field mappings, Ampersand provides the flexibility to handle it without maintaining that complexity yourself. If you’re selling to mid-market and enterprise segments where integration depth is a requirement, pick Ampersand. **Pros** - **Declarative framework with version control:** Define integrations in `amp.yaml` manifest files that live in your git repository. Your integration code goes through the same code review process as your product code. CI/CD pipelines can test integration changes before deployment. This approach treats integrations as first-class code rather than configuration living in a vendor's dashboard. - **Depth over breadth:** Read and write to any standard or custom object and field in your customer's CRM, not constrained by a unified schema that might not include the fields your customer actually uses. Ampersand handles enterprise complexity that unified APIs struggle with: 50 million contacts, custom objects created yesterday, field-level permissions that vary by user. - **Developer-centric architecture:** RESTful APIs, CLI tools, and SDKs designed for engineers rather than retrofitted from low-code tools. No heavy sales process requiring demos and multiple calls before you can start building. Spin up the free tier and start coding immediately. The developer experience reflects the founding team's background: they've built integrations before and understand what developers actually need. - **Managed infrastructure at scale:** The platform handles rate limiting intelligently (queuing requests rather than failing), manages credential refreshing automatically, implements retry logic with exponential backoff, and optimizes bulk API usage. Scales to 300,000+ daily record updates per customer without your team managing the infrastructure complexity. - **Granular observability:** Object-level and field-level logging shows exactly what data synced, what failed, and why. When something breaks, you can see that record ID 12345's phone_number field failed validation, not just "sync failed." This enables proactive debugging versus reactive firefighting when customers report issues. - **Real-time context for AI agents:** Optimized for delivering CRM context to AI applications in seconds rather than minutes. Critical for agentic workflows: 11x cut their AI agent response time from 60 seconds to 5. When your AI agent needs to answer questions about a prospect's pipeline, waiting a minute for data makes the product unusable. - **Usage-based pricing aligned with value:** Pay for data delivered (per GB), not per connector or API call. Predictable costs that scale with actual usage rather than arbitrary limits. Free tier provides 2GB data, letting you build and test before committing to paid plans. **Cons** - **Focused on depth rather than breadth:** Ampersand has an impressive list of integrations, but other providers may offer more without going as deep. - **Developer resources required:** code first approach assumes engineering team involvement. Not ideal if you want 100% no-code business user configuration. Product teams comfortable with YAML and git workflows will thrive; teams wanting purely visual configuration should look elsewhere. **Pricing** - Free tier: Up to 2 GB data delivered - Paid plans: Starting at $999/month for 2GB data delivered monthly - Enterprise pricing: Contact sales for volume commitments and SLAs **Voice of the User** "I have built hundreds of integrations at Clay. Ampersand is the first developer platform that gets it right." *Clay engineering team* "Voice agents are a hard problem to solve. At 11x, engaging sales prospects instantly is critical! Using Ampersand, we cut Julian's (our AI phone agent) response time from 60 seconds to 5." *11x team* **Why Ampersand Stands Out** Most embedded iPaaS platforms force a choice: low-code simplicity (limited depth) or unified APIs (standardized schemas). Ampersand breaks this tradeoff by giving developers a code first framework with low-code execution. The declarative manifest approach means integrations are version-controlled like product code, testable in CI/CD pipelines, flexible enough for any custom field or object, and scalable to enterprise data volumes. The platform excels for companies competing on integration quality, not quantity. If closing enterprise deals depends on handling each customer's exact CRM setup (custom objects, specific fields, complex workflows), Ampersand delivers the depth you need without maintaining infrastructure yourself. The AI-native positioning matters as more SaaS products embed AI agents. Those agents need fresh context, not stale batch data from overnight syncs. Ampersand's architecture (optimized for real-time data delivery) makes it uniquely suited for AI-powered products, not just traditional integrations. --- ### 2. Prismatic **Quick Overview** Prismatic is a comprehensive embedded iPaaS built exclusively for B2B SaaS companies from day one. It offers both low-code visual designers and full-code development options, extensive prebuilt connectors, and robust customer self service capabilities. This makes it a versatile platform for SaaS integration teams with diverse technical backgrounds. **Best For** B2B SaaS teams that need **maximum feature breadth** and want flexibility between low-code (for non technical team members) and code-based development. Particularly companies building diverse integration portfolios across multiple app categories. **Pros** - **Excels at embedded use case:** Not retrofitted from enterprise iPaaS. Every feature designed for customer facing integrations from the ground up. The architecture, UX, and feature set reflect deep understanding of what SaaS companies need versus what enterprises need. - **Hybrid development approach:** Low-code visual designer plus full API/CLI for code-native workflows. Teams choose the right tool per integration. Support engineers can build simple workflows visually; developers can write complex logic in code. - **Extensive component library:** prebuilt connectors and logic components accelerate development without sacrificing customization. The library includes authentication handlers, data transformation utilities, and workflow templates that reduce repetitive coding. - **Versioning and deployment controls:** Release pipelines with approval workflows. Critical for pushing changes to production safely. See what changed between versions, roll back if needed, and enforce gates before customer facing deployments. **Cons** - **Infrastructure scalability concerns:** Some users report performance issues at high scale. May require workarounds for very large enterprise data volumes. The platform handles typical workloads well but can show strain with millions of daily records per customer. - **Pricing complexity:** Feature-rich platform means more variables in pricing model. Can be hard to predict costs as usage scales. Multiple dimensions (connectors, execution time, data volume) create estimation challenges. **Pricing** Professional tier with custom pricing based on integrations and usage. Contact sales for detailed quote. --- ### 3. Paragon **Quick Overview** Paragon provides a best-in-class embedded integration platform with exceptional developer experience. The defining feature: write integrations in code OR use the visual builder interchangeably, syncing workflows to GitHub for version control. **Best For** Engineering teams at SaaS and developer tool companies that need code first flexibility with optional low-code for specific workflows. Particularly, teams that want git-based version control for their integrations. **Pros** - **Code and visual builder interchangeability:** Write in code, view in visual builder, or vice versa. - **Full release pipeline:** Strict controls on production deployments, visibility into version changes, warnings for breaking changes. Prevents the "oops, I just broke integrations for 500 customers" scenario that haunts integration teams. - **Flexible implementation:** White-labeled marketplace, native SDK, or headless. Choose the UX that fits your product. - **Autoscaling infrastructure:** Handles rate limits and performance optimization automatically. **Cons** - **Newer platform:** Less mature than Workato/Tray. May have feature gaps for very specific use cases. The core platform is solid, but edge cases might require workarounds or waiting for features. - **Higher pricing tier:** Premium positioning means less accessible for early-stage startups. The value justifies the cost for growth stage companies, but seed-stage teams may find it expensive. **Pricing** Starter plans available, scales with usage. Contact for pricing details. --- ### 4. Workato Embedded **Quick Overview** Workato Embedded is the embedded version of Workato's enterprise iPaaS platform. It offers 1,000+ prebuilt connectors and extensive automation templates. The most established and well-funded option, providing stability and breadth for companies needing broad app coverage. **Best For** Large enterprises needing the largest connector library and maximum stability. Particularly teams that value platform maturity and financial backing over cutting-edge embedded-specific features. **Pros** - **Massive connector library:** 1,000+ connectors and hundreds of thousands of automation templates. Unmatched breadth of prebuilt integrations. If there's a SaaS app with an API, Workato probably has a connector for it. - **Enterprise stability:** Most funding and revenue of any embedded iPaaS. Safe long-term partner for mission-critical integrations. The company isn't going anywhere, which matters when you're building core product functionality on their infrastructure. - **Low-code interface:** Drag and drop designer accessible to non-developers. Reduces engineering bottleneck for straightforward integrations. Product managers and operations teams can build basic workflows independently. - **AI/ML connector support:** Integrates with Anthropic, Amazon SageMaker, and other AI platforms. Emerging AI workflows supported as first-class connectors rather than custom API work. **Cons** - **Secondary focus:** Embedded offering is add-on to core automation platform. R&D resources skewed toward main product, resulting in slower evolution for embedded features. You're not the primary customer, and it shows in feature velocity. - **No sandbox environments:** Can't test integrations before production. Risky for complex workflows, increases likelihood of breaking changes. You're essentially testing in production with customer data. - **Limited post-sales support for embedded:** Support resources focused on core platform. Embedded customers may not get responsive strategic guidance. When you need help, you're competing for attention with larger enterprise automation customers. - **Ruby-only SDK:** Custom connector development limited to whitelisted Ruby subset. Lacks flexibility for developers preferring other languages. If your team works primarily in Python or JavaScript, the Ruby constraint creates friction. **Pricing** Enterprise pricing model, requires sales engagement. Contact for quote. --- ### 5. Tray Embedded **Quick Overview** Tray Embedded provides a low-code integration platform with an embeddable marketplace and configuration wizards. Originally built for internal automation, now offers embedded capabilities for SaaS companies. Best suited for operations teams and business users over developers. **Best For** Operations teams and non-technical product teams that want a low-code iPaaS without heavy developer involvement. Works well for companies prioritizing speed and simplicity over deep customization. **Pros** - **Low-code drag-and-drop designer:** Accessible to non-developers, reduces engineering dependency for basic integrations. Business analysts and operations teams can contribute directly to integration development. - **Embedded marketplace:** prebuilt integrations can be embedded in your product with customer self-activation. Reduces implementation burden by letting customers enable integrations themselves. - **Configuration wizards:** Guides customers through setup, field mapping, and data sync configuration. Lowers the bar for customers who aren't technical but need integrations working. - **Established platform:** Mature product with years of development behind core automation capabilities. The underlying technology is battle-tested with thousands of customers. **Cons** - **Limited developer tools:** No CLI, only partial API functionality. Not ideal for engineering teams wanting full code control. If your integration strategy requires programmatic deployment and version control, Tray creates friction. - **Not truly embedded-first:** Core focus remains on main automation product, not optimized for customer facing embedded use cases. Features designed for internal automation don't always translate well to multi-tenant embedded scenarios. - **Lacks self service support:** No integrated logging/alerting tools for customers to troubleshoot their own integrations. When integrations break, customers contact your support team, which contacts Tray support. - **Custom integration limitations:** Complex or non-standard integrations require workarounds. May hit platform constraints when enterprise prospects need sophisticated sync logic. **Pricing** Contact for pricing based on usage and features. --- ### 6. Cyclr **Quick Overview** Cyclr is a UK-based embedded iPaaS specializing in affordable, low-code integrations with 400+ prebuilt connectors. The oldest and most budget-friendly option in this comparison. Ideal for companies prioritizing cost efficiency and connector breadth. **Best For** Cost-conscious SaaS companies and smaller teams that need solid connector coverage without premium pricing. Particularly businesses serving SMB customers where integration depth is less critical than covering common apps. **Pros** - **Budget-friendly pricing:** Most affordable option on this list. Accessible for startups and smaller SaaS companies operating on tight budgets. The pricing makes embedded iPaaS feasible for companies that might otherwise build everything custom. - **Extensive connector library:** 500+ prebuilt connectors cover most common SaaS apps. From major CRMs to niche vertical tools, Cyclr has connectors that save months of API integration work. - **Low-code builder:** Visual workflow designer accessible to non-developers. Product managers and customer success teams can build integrations without engineering involvement. - **White-labeled marketplace:** Customers can self-activate integrations in embedded marketplace. Reduces your activation workload by enabling customer self service. - **Connector creation toolkit:** Build custom connectors without deep technical expertise. When you need an app that's not in the library, you can add it yourself. **Cons** - **Limited endpoint coverage:** Connectors may not support all endpoints for each app. May require workarounds for advanced use cases. The breadth is impressive, but depth per connector varies significantly. - **No code-native development:** No API/CLI for developers. Must use low-code tools even for complex logic. Engineering teams comfortable with code will find this constraint frustrating. - **Clunky developer experience:** Less polished than modern platforms. Some users report outdated UX patterns. The platform works, but doesn't feel as refined as newer competitors. - **Basic authentication/monitoring:** Lacks advanced features like granular field-level logging. When debugging integration issues, you have less visibility into exactly what failed and why. **Pricing** Starts at lower tier pricing, scales with usage. Contact for detailed pricing. --- ### 7. Pandium **Quick Overview** Pandium takes a purely code first approach to embedded iPaaS, treating code as a strength rather than something to avoid. It provides an integration platform for developers who want full control, Git sync, and modern CI/CD workflows. The 200+ connectors handle auth and connections without predefined endpoints. **Best For** Developer-focused SaaS teams that prefer building integrations entirely in code and want connectors that provide authentication/connection management without limiting endpoint access. Particularly teams with strong engineering culture. **Pros** - **Pure code first philosophy:** Integrations built entirely in code. No low-code compromise, full developer control. If your team thinks in TypeScript and React, Pandium speaks your language. - **Flexible connectors:** 200+ connectors handle auth and connections but don't constrain which endpoints you access. Full API coverage. You're not limited to the fields and objects someone else decided to include in a standardized schema. - **Git synchronization:** Version control for integrations just like application code. Seamless CI/CD integration. - **Developer-friendly pricing:** Designed to be affordable for engineering teams building custom solutions. The economics work for companies with strong technical teams who want control. - **Reduced technical debt:** Code-based integrations are easier to maintain and refactor than visual workflows. When requirements change, you refactor integration code the same way you refactor product code. **Cons** - **Requires developer resources:** Not suitable for companies wanting non-technical team members to build integrations. If your strategy involves product managers or operations teams deploying integrations, Pandium won't work. - **Smaller community:** Less established than competitors. Smaller ecosystem of shared integrations and support resources. You'll find fewer examples, blog posts, and community solutions when you hit issues. **Pricing** Developer-friendly pricing model. Contact for details. --- ### 8. Merge **Quick Overview** Merge provides unified APIs across HR, accounting, CRM, ticketing, ATS, and other categories with a standardized schema that simplifies integration development. While technically a different approach than embedded iPaaS (unified API versus flexible platform), it competes in the same market for customer facing integrations. **Best For** SaaS companies that need broad integration coverage across multiple app categories and prefer standardized data schemas over deep customization. Particularly products serving SMB customers with standard integration needs. **Pros** - **Unified schema approach:** One API to access multiple apps per category. Dramatically reduces integration development time. Build one Salesforce integration, get HubSpot and Pipedrive with minimal additional work. - **Broad category coverage:** HR, payroll, accounting, CRM, ticketing, ATS, file storage. Comprehensive coverage across business functions. If your product needs to integrate with multiple categories, Merge offers a single vendor solution. - **Fast time-to-market:** Launch 50+ integrations in weeks versus months of custom development. The standardized approach means you're not building and maintaining dozens of unique integrations. - **Standardized data models:** Consistent field naming and structure across apps. Simplifies downstream logic in your product. Your application code doesn't need conditional logic for "is this Salesforce or HubSpot?" **Cons** - **Limited customization:** Unified schema means can't access custom fields/objects. Not suitable for deep enterprise integrations. When an enterprise prospect needs to sync their custom "Risk_Assessment__c" field, Merge can't help. - **Depth versus breadth tradeoff:** Optimizes for covering many apps quickly, not for handling complex per-customer configurations. The standardization that enables speed simultaneously constrains flexibility. - **Not embedded iPaaS:** Different architecture. Less flexibility for workflow customization and complex business logic. Merge excels at data sync but doesn't provide the workflow automation capabilities of full iPaaS platforms. **Pricing** Usage-based pricing per integration category. Contact for quote. --- ## Summary Comparison Table | Platform | Starting Price | Best For | Notable Features | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Ampersand** | Free (2GB), $999/month for 2GB monthly | Deep, customer-configurable integrations for growth and enterprise customers | Declarative framework, version control, AI-native, usage-based pricing | | **Prismatic** | Custom pricing | Maximum feature breadth with hybrid low-code/code | Embedded, versioning, customer self service | | **Paragon** | Contact sales | SaaS and developer tools needing code flexibility | Git sync, MCP server, RAG pipelines, interchangeable code/visual | | **Workato Embedded** | Enterprise pricing | Large connector library | 1,000+ connectors, enterprise backing, AI/ML integrations | | **Tray Embedded** | Contact sales | Low-code for operations teams | Drag-and-drop, embedded marketplace, non-technical friendly | | **Cyclr** | Budget-friendly | Cost-conscious teams | 500+ connectors, white-labeled marketplace, affordable pricing | | **Pandium** | Developer pricing | code first teams wanting full control | Pure code approach, Git sync, flexible connectors | | **Merge** | Usage-based | Broad coverage with unified APIs | Standardized schemas, fast deployment, multiple categories | **Upgrade your product integration strategy with Ampersand's developer-first platform** → [Start free today](https://www.withampersand.com/) --- ## Why Ampersand Is Built for Enterprise Integration Depth The embedded iPaaS landscape offers something for everyone, but integration depth separates winning from losing in enterprise SaaS deals. When your product competes for six-figure ACV customers, integrations become deal requirements, not nice-to-haves. Enterprise buyers expect your product to sync with their exact CRM setup: custom objects for their unique sales process, specific fields for their compliance workflows, bidirectional sync that respects their data governance rules. **Ampersand’s deep support for custom fields out of the box makes it the platform of choice for enterprise ready integrations.** While unified APIs optimize for breadth, Ampersand optimized for depth. Ampersand handles the custom configurations that enterprise customers demand. The declarative framework gives developers the flexibility to mirror native APIs without maintaining infrastructure. Version control ensures integrations evolve safely alongside your product. Usage-based pricing aligns costs with value delivered. For AI-powered products, Ampersand's real-time context delivery makes it uniquely suited for agentic workflows requiring fresh CRM data. When 11x needed their AI agent to respond instantly, they achieved 12× speed improvements by switching to Ampersand. **Bottom line:** If your growth strategy targets mid-market and enterprise customers where integration quality is a competitive wedge, Ampersand delivers the depth and developer experience to win those deals. --- ## FAQs ### Why choose integration as code over low-code iPaaS? integration as code platforms like Ampersand treat integrations as version-controlled code that lives in your git repository, enabling proper CI/CD workflows, code review, and automated testing. This approach provides the flexibility to handle custom objects, complex field mappings, and enterprise-specific requirements that visual builders can't accommodate. For teams selling to mid-market and enterprise customers who demand deep integrations, code first infrastructure delivers the depth and control that low-code platforms sacrifice for simplicity. ### How do I handle custom CRM objects in integrations? Custom CRM objects require integration infrastructure that mirrors native APIs rather than forcing data into standardized schemas. Ampersand's declarative framework lets you read and write to any custom object or field in your customer's CRM, including objects created after your integration launches. This flexibility is essential for enterprise customers with industry-specific data models that don't fit unified API schemas, like manufacturing companies with custom product configurations or healthcare providers with compliance-specific fields. ### When should I use a unified API vs. deep integration infrastructure? Use unified APIs like Merge when you need to quickly cover many apps with standard data models for SMB customers. Choose deep integration infrastructure like Ampersand when you're selling to mid-market and enterprise customers who require custom field mappings, bidirectional sync with complex business logic, and high-volume data processing (millions of records). The decision hinges on customer segment: if your deals depend on handling each prospect's unique CRM configuration, Ampersand's approach provides the flexibility unified APIs can't match. ### What integration approach is best for enterprise customers? Enterprise customers require integration infrastructure that handles custom objects, sophisticated field mappings, and high data volumes without performance degradation. Ampersand's integration as code approach excels here by providing declarative frameworks that mirror native CRM APIs, managed infrastructure that scales to 300,000+ daily record updates per customer, and granular field-level observability for troubleshooting. This depth matters when closing six-figure deals that hinge on syncing the prospect's exact CRM setup. ### If I'm successful with internal automation (Zapier/Make), should I invest in embedded iPaaS? Yes, because they solve different problems. Zapier handles internal workflows for your team, while embedded iPaaS powers customer facing product integrations. If customers need to connect their systems to your product (common in B2B SaaS), embedded iPaaS becomes essential infrastructure that drives retention (63% of companies invest in integrations for this reason) and competitive differentiation. Ampersand's integration as code approach particularly suits teams that have outgrown makeshift solutions and need enterprise-grade integration infrastructure. ### How quickly can I see results from implementing embedded iPaaS? Most teams deploy their first production integration within 2-4 weeks, with faster velocity on subsequent integrations. Code first platforms like Ampersand require developer involvement but offer more flexibility for complex enterprise use cases, while low-code platforms enable faster deployments for simpler scenarios. Companies targeting enterprise customers typically see measurable ROI within 3-6 months through improved win rates and customer retention. ### Is Ampersand better than Merge for B2B SaaS integrations? It depends on your customer segment and integration requirements. Merge excels at breadth, providing unified APIs that quickly cover 50+ apps with standardized schemas, ideal for SMB customers with standard integration needs. Ampersand excels at depth, handling custom objects, complex field mappings, and enterprise-scale data volumes that mid-market and enterprise customers demand. If your deals depend on syncing custom CRM fields and objects, Ampersand's integration as code approach provides the flexibility unified APIs can't match. ### What are the best alternatives to Workato Embedded? For developer experience and enterprise integration depth, Ampersand offers superior flexibility with its integration as code approach and usage-based pricing that scales more predictably than Workato's enterprise model. For maximum embedded-specific features, Prismatic provides purpose-built tooling with better versioning and self service capabilities. For AI-native workflows, Paragon supports Model Context Protocol servers. For budget-conscious teams, Cyclr offers solid connector coverage at accessible pricing.
Back to articles